+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ The FidoNet News Gate (Huntsville, AL - USA) +
+ The views of this user are strictly his or her own. + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Re: i.synchro.net] page changed: ref:cterm
By: deuce to alt.bbs.synchronet on Fri Feb 09 2024 05:09 am
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ The FidoNet News Gate (Huntsville, AL - USA) +
+ The views of this user are strictly his or her own. + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Whoever this is, please stop. This newsgroup is *already* gated to the FidoNet SYNCHRONET echo on Vertrauen. Thanks,
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ The FidoNet News Gate (Huntsville, AL - USA) +
+ The views of this user are strictly his or her own. + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Whoever this is, please stop. This newsgroup is *already* gated to the FidoNet
YNCHRONET echo on Vertrauen. Thanks,
Re: i.synchro.net] page changed: ref:cterm
By: deuce to alt.bbs.synchronet on Fri Feb 09 2024 05:09 am
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ The FidoNet News Gate (Huntsville, AL - USA) +
+ The views of this user are strictly his or her own. + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Whoever this is, please stop. This newsgroup is *already* gated to the FidoNet SYNCHRONET echo on Vertrauen. Thanks,
--
digital man (rob)
Rush quote #61:
He's a rebel and a runner, he's a signal turning green .. New World Man Norco, CA WX: 46.3°F, 83.0% humidity, 1 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California - telnet://vert.synchro.net
The gating on this system of a selected few alt.bbs newsgrops is to a
very few nodes in Region 19 that don't run a Synchronet system with a
direct news link. It is obvious that one of them has a re-post problem
and the dupe are coming in with a different MSGID kludge. I will find
out which one it is and have him either unlink from the
ALT-BBS-SYNCHRONET echo or correct the
dupe problem.
To: Marc Lewis
Re: Re: FidoNet News Gate
By: Marc Lewis to alt.bbs.synchronet on Mon Feb 12 2024 04:37 pm
The gating on this system of a selected few alt.bbs newsgrops is to
a very few nodes in Region 19 that don't run a Synchronet system
with a direct news link. It is obvious that one of them has a
re-post problem and the dupe are coming in with a different MSGID
kludge. I will find out which one it is and have him either unlink
from the ALT-BBS-SYNCHRONET echo or correct the
dupe problem.
Okay, thanks for looking into it.
Rob, I sent you NetMail about having cancelled the alt-bbs-synchronet
echo, After the fact I tracked down the problem system and have sent
him a message to either correct his dupe problem or I would unlink him
from all echomail feed from my system... He answered back and unlinked
the alt-bbs-synchronet echo from his system.
I may re-establish a link in the Newsgate program to alt.bbs.synchronet
IFF I am convinced that there are no more dupes coming in that are
getting past the Squish dupe detection that are headed for the Newsgate progam... That is unless you have any objection.
I may re-establish a link in the Newsgate program to
alt.bbs.synchronet IFF I am convinced that there are no more dupes
coming in that are getting past the Squish dupe detection that are
headed for the Newsgate progam... That is unless you have any
objection.
The important thing to understand is that the SYNCHRONET echo on
FidoNet and the alt.bbs.synchronet newsgroup are already gated to each
other (here on Vertrauen). If you're going to use Newsgate to gate alt.bbs.synchronet to FTN, it's important that it gets distributed via
FTN with an echo-tag *other* than SYNCHRONET. I have no objection so
long as that's understood.
The important thing to understand is that the SYNCHRONET echo on
FidoNet and the alt.bbs.synchronet newsgroup are already gated to each other (here on Vertrauen). If you're going to use Newsgate to gate alt.bbs.synchronet to FTN, it's important that it gets distributed via
FTN with an echo-tag *other* than SYNCHRONET. I have no objection so
long as that's understood.
It's limited distribution (as far as I know) in Region 19 as "ALT-BBS-SYNCHRONET". (Note there are no dots as my old Squish tosser
(under OS/2) can't handle echo names with dots in them.
To: MarcL
Re: Re: FidoNet News Gate
By: MarcL to alt.bbs.synchronet on Wed Feb 14 2024 01:40 am
The important thing to understand is that the SYNCHRONET echo on
FidoNet and the alt.bbs.synchronet newsgroup are already gated to
each other (here on Vertrauen). If you're going to use Newsgate to
gate alt.bbs.synchronet to FTN, it's important that it gets
distributed via FTN with an echo-tag *other* than SYNCHRONET. I
have no objection so long as that's understood.
It's limited distribution (as far as I know) in Region 19 as "ALT-BBS-SYNCHRONET". (Note there are no dots as my old Squish
tosser (under OS/2) can't handle echo names with dots in them.
Okay, sounds good to me then.
From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.synchronet
"Digital Man" <digital.man@vert.synchro.net.remove-prp-this> wrote in news:65CC333C.51275.sync@vert.synchro.net:
To: MarcL
Re: Re: FidoNet News Gate
By: MarcL to alt.bbs.synchronet on Wed Feb 14 2024 01:40 am
The important thing to understand is that the SYNCHRONET echo on FidoNet and the alt.bbs.synchronet newsgroup are already gated
to each other (here on Vertrauen). If you're going to use
Newsgate to gate alt.bbs.synchronet to FTN, it's important that
it gets distributed via FTN with an echo-tag *other* than
SYNCHRONET. I have no objection so long as that's understood.
It's limited distribution (as far as I know) in Region 19 as "ALT-BBS-SYNCHRONET". (Note there are no dots as my old Squish
tosser (under OS/2) can't handle echo names with dots in them.
Okay, sounds good to me then.
Okay, I'll link it only to BBSes in R19 that aren't running
Synchronet software... would be 'kinda redundant to link to them. <g>
It's limited distribution (as far as I know) in Region 19 as "ALT-BBS-SYNCHRONET". (Note there are no dots as my old Squish
tosser (under OS/2) can't handle echo names with dots in them.
Okay, sounds good to me then.
Okay, I'll link it only to BBSes in R19 that aren't running
Synchronet software... would be 'kinda redundant to link to them. <g>
You know that this group is shared as SYNCHRONET on Fido, so you're
already providing it to your downlinks. Seems like duplicate effort?
It may in fact be a duplicate effort in the case of the SYNCHRONET echo, but it is not the only newsgroup that I offer to those that aren't running a system with a built-in newsgroup system. As I mentioned before I'm certainly not trying to step on anyone's (Digitalman) toes by offering it as an echo. I believe, as I said before, that I've eliminated the unfortunate duplicate message posting problem so as NOT annoy others in the actual newsgroup.
It may in fact be a duplicate effort in the case of the SYNCHRONET echo, but it is not the only newsgroup that I offer to those that aren't running a system with a built-in newsgroup system. As I mentioned before I'm certainly not trying to step on anyone's (Digitalman) toes by offering it as an echo. I believe, as I said before, that I've eliminated the unfortunate duplicate message posting problem so as NOT annoy others in the actual newsgroup.
I have not seen any dupes since the original batch, so I think you did
fix
it.
#
To: Marc Lewis
It may in fact be a duplicate effort in the case of the SYNCHRONET
echo, but it is not the only newsgroup that I offer to those that
aren't running a system with a built-in newsgroup system. As I
mentioned before I'm certainly not trying to step on anyone's
(Digitalman) toes by offering it as an echo. I believe, as I said
before, that I've eliminated the unfortunate duplicate message
posting problem so as NOT annoy others in the actual newsgroup.
I have not seen any dupes since the original batch, so I think you did
fix it.
I have not seen any dupes since the original batch, so I think you did
fix it.
Have you seen any dupe messages today (20Feb24)?
To: MARCL
I have not seen any dupes since the original batch, so I think you
did fix it.
Have you seen any dupe messages today (20Feb24)?
No I have not noticed any, yesterday (20th) or today.
If they were exact dupes, and not reprocessed messages, Synchronet may
have filtered them out.
* SLMR 2.1a * It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
---
■ Synchronet ■ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net *
Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
* Vertrauen - Riverside County, California -
telnet://vert.synchro.net
It's Sunday the 25th... Have any dupes shown up since your last post? (Hopefully not!!)
| Sysop: | digital man |
|---|---|
| Location: | Riverside County, California |
| Users: | 1,044 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 45:39:40 |
| Calls: | 500,942 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 109,374 |
| D/L today: |
5,405 files (1,012M bytes) |
| Messages: | 304,050 |